RAVINDRA NAGAPPA CHILOBA DIED THR LRS SONABAI AND ORS. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR. AND ORS — CA/4046/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030121342026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CA/9073/2026

Filing Date

25-03-2026

Registration No

CA/4046/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

RAVINDRA NAGAPPA CHILOBA DIED THR LRS SONABAI AND ORS.

Adv. Ingale Vivekanand V.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR. AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

07-04-2026

AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

04-05-2026

FOR ORDERS

24-04-2026
09-04-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed an application for condonation of 964 days delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellant Ravindra Nagappa Chiloba on record. The court found the delay was not deliberately caused and granted the application in the interest of justice, setting aside the abatement and directing the appellant to amend the appeal memo within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed an application for condonation of 964 days delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellant Ravindra Nagappa Chiloba on record. The court found the delay was not deliberately caused and granted the application in the interest of justice, setting aside the abatement and directing the appellant to amend the appeal memo within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case