HIRAMAN RAMCHANDRA RITHE vs THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/4950/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030121222026

Filing Number

WP/9061/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/4950/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRAMAN RAMCHANDRA RITHE

    Adv. Chandak Raviraj R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON UOI AND ADV. SHARMA FOR R/2 AND 3. 1123

  2. 2.DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, AURANGABAD

  3. 3.THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) NAGPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by Hiraman Ramchandra Rithe challenging a penalty order dated 20.02.2026 under Section 271-D of the Income Tax Act. The court quashed and set aside the penalty order, finding the issue was squarely covered by precedent decisions, and directed that penalty proceedings remain in abeyance pending the outcome of the petitioner's appeal before the CIT(A) against the underlying assessment order under Section 147 of the IT Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4950/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by Hiraman Ramchandra Rithe challenging a penalty order dated 20.02.2026 under Section 271-D of the Income Tax Act. The court quashed and set aside the penalty order, finding the issue was squarely covered by precedent decisions, and directed that penalty proceedings remain in abeyance pending the outcome of the petitioner's appeal before the CIT(A) against the underlying assessment order under Section 147 of the IT Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case