NITIN MANIK BACHKE vs THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, THROUGH IT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — EPAP/34/2025

Case under Representation of People Act 1950,1951 Section 80. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030121072025

Filing Number

EPAP/9213/2025

Filing Date

21-Mar-2025

Registration No

EPAP/34/2025

Registration Date

25-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Representation of People Act 1950,1951 Section 80

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN MANIK BACHKE

    Adv. B. SHWETAMBARI. R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, THROUGH IT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    Case Summary: In Election Petition No. 9 of 2025 (with Application EP/34/2025) before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, the court noted that while counsel Mr. Vikrant Palshikar circulated the matter, he failed to file the requisite Vakilpatra (power of attorney), making it impossible to determine which party he represents. The case was adjourned and stood over to 15.06.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  5. 11-Jun-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  6. 09-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  7. 09-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EPAP/34/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Election Petition No. 9 of 2025 (with Application EP/34/2025) before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, the court noted that while counsel Mr. Vikrant Palshikar circulated the matter, he failed to file the requisite Vakilpatra (power of attorney), making it impossible to determine which party he represents. The case was adjourned and stood over to 15.06.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case