SIEMENS LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGER HR vs SHENDRA SIEMENS KAMGAR / KARMACHARI SANGHATANA THROUGH SECRETARY Advocate - Kawre B.R. — WP/5290/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030120832019
Filing Number
WP/9373/2019
Filing Date
15-Mar-2019
Registration No
WP/5290/2019
Registration Date
02-May-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIEMENS LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGER HR
Adv. MARLAPALLE YUGANT RAMCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHENDRA SIEMENS KAMGAR / KARMACHARI SANGHATANA THROUGH SECRETARY Advocate - Kawre B.R.
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
Case Summary: WP 5290/2019 Outcome: Writ Petition Dismissed Siemens Ltd.'s petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal's decision was dismissed. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that Siemens employed more than 100 workmen at the time of closure (August 2014), thereby triggering stringent Chapter V-B requirements under the Industrial Disputes Act rather than the simpler Chapter V-A closure procedure Siemens invoked. The court found Siemens deliberately suppressed employee numbers by excluding 28+ staff and indirect workers who qualified as "workmen," and rejected Siemens's burden-of-proof argument, holding that once the union provided evidence, Siemens failed to rebut it with required documentary proof (wages register), justifying an adverse inference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
29-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
21-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
06-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
18-Mar-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
04-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
20-Jan-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
08-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
03-Dec-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
03-Dec-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
01-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
13-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
21-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
18-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
08-Apr-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
25-Feb-2025
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
27-Jan-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
13-Jan-2025
Revoked
According To Sitting List
-
13-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
17-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
20-Jun-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. SuryawanshiView PDF
-
27-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
14-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
14-Nov-2022
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
12-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
09-Mar-2022
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre
-
08-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish DangreView PDF
-
29-Apr-2020
Urgent Circulation -CIVIL
According To Sitting List
-
22-Jan-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. DeoView PDF
-
22-Jan-2020
Urgent Circulation -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo
-
17-Jan-2020
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo
-
13-Jan-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. DeoView PDF
-
13-Jan-2020
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo
-
10-Dec-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
10-Dec-2019
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
18-Nov-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
18-Nov-2019
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
16-Oct-2019
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
27-Sep-2019
Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
18-Sep-2019
Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
07-Aug-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
17-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
17-Jul-2019
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
17-Jun-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
17-Jun-2019
Petitions For Admission - Fresh - CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
03-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5290/2019
Case Summary: WP 5290/2019 Outcome: Writ Petition Dismissed Siemens Ltd.'s petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal's decision was dismissed. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that Siemens employed more than 100 workmen at the time of closure (August 2014), thereby triggering stringent Chapter V-B requirements under the Industrial Disputes Act rather than the simpler Chapter V-A closure procedure Siemens invoked. The court found Siemens deliberately suppressed employee numbers by excluding 28+ staff and indirect workers who qualified as "workmen," and rejected Siemens's burden-of-proof argument, holding that once the union provided evidence, Siemens failed to rebut it with required documentary proof (wages register), justifying an adverse inference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts