NAJER MAJJID SAUDAGAR vs ABDUL GAFFAR ABDUL HABIB THEKIYA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1126/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030120822026

Filing Number

APPLN/3043/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

APPLN/1126/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAJER MAJJID SAUDAGAR

    Adv. Dharurkar Chaitanya V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL GAFFAR ABDUL HABIB THEKIYA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. COPY SERVED TO PP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected Abdul Gaffar Abdul Habib Thekiya's anticipatory bail application in a Rs. 10 lakh online cheating case. The court found credible evidence beyond co-accused statements—including CDR records showing continuous phone contact between Thekiya and the main perpetrator—establishing Thekiya's role in orchestrating a conspiracy to defraud the complainant through a fake poultry grain sale, with Thekiya receiving Rs. 2,10,000 from the proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/1126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected Abdul Gaffar Abdul Habib Thekiya's anticipatory bail application in a Rs. 10 lakh online cheating case. The court found credible evidence beyond co-accused statements—including CDR records showing continuous phone contact between Thekiya and the main perpetrator—establishing Thekiya's role in orchestrating a conspiracy to defraud the complainant through a fake poultry grain sale, with Thekiya receiving Rs. 2,10,000 from the proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case