NARAYAN S/O. NIVRATTI SATPUTE AND ANR. VITTHAL D BHISE AND SHITAL S ADKINE. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS. — CA/4377/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030120512026

Filing Number

CA/9003/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/4377/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION - SINGLE BENCH ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYAN S/O. NIVRATTI SATPUTE AND ANR. VITTHAL D BHISE AND SHITAL S ADKINE.

  2. 2.DROPATI NARAYAN SAPUTE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS.

    Adv. AGP WAIVES FOR R/1 AND 2,SURVASE B R FOR R/3. 1123

  2. 2.THE SPECIAL LAND, ACQUISITION OFFICER (M.K.V.),PARBHANI

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT, MAJALGAON RIGHT CANAL, PARBHANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    Case Summary: CA 4377/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed four consolidated land acquisition appeals challenging 2006-2007 awards for the Nimna Dudhana project in Parbhani district. The court condoned the 19-year delay in filing appeals after finding no bad faith. The court enhanced compensation for dry land from Rs.760-1100 per are to Rs.3,994 per are based on parity with similar project acquisitions, granted 10% annual escalation, but denied interest and statutory benefits for the delayed filing period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/4377/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA 4377/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partially allowed four consolidated land acquisition appeals challenging 2006-2007 awards for the Nimna Dudhana project in Parbhani district. The court condoned the 19-year delay in filing appeals after finding no bad faith. The court enhanced compensation for dry land from Rs.760-1100 per are to Rs.3,994 per are based on parity with similar project acquisitions, granted 10% annual escalation, but denied interest and statutory benefits for the delayed filing period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case