NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PIU, JALGAON THROUGH ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V PAWAR MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH vs GANESH SONU KOLI AND ANOTHER — CA/7297/2025
Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030119502025
e-Filing Number
08-02-2025
Filing Number
CA/9088/2025
Filing Date
20-03-2025
Registration No
CA/7297/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PIU, JALGAON THROUGH ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V PAWAR MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH
Respondent(s)
GANESH SONU KOLI AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,BHOSALE RAMDAS B. 1123
The Competent Authority Land Acquisition And Sub Divisional Officer At Bhusawal
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Revoked
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Revoked |
| 10-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE |
| 29-09-2025 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the National Highways Authority of India's arbitration appeal challenging the arbitrator's award of ₹2,400 per sq. mtr. compensation for 650 sq. mtr. of land acquired in village Chikhali for NH-6 expansion. The court upheld the arbitral award and the district court's confirmation, finding the arbitrator's deductions for distance (15 km from reference villages) and plot size were reasonable and consistent with precedent established in a related appeal involving the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the National Highways Authority of India's arbitration appeal challenging the arbitrator's award of ₹2,400 per sq. mtr. compensation for 650 sq. mtr. of land acquired in village Chikhali for NH-6 expansion. The court upheld the arbitral award and the district court's confirmation, finding the arbitrator's deductions for distance (15 km from reference villages) and plot size were reasonable and consistent with precedent established in a related appeal involving the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts