SHAIKH NASEER SHAIKH IBRAHIM vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/11836/2014

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030119012014

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

05th January 2015

Filing Number

WP/9147/2014

Filing Date

04-04-2014

Registration No

WP/11836/2014

Registration Date

29-12-2014

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet
Mah.regional Town Planning Act 1966

Petitioner(s)

SHAIKH NASEER SHAIKH IBRAHIM

Adv. Kale Ajeet B.,KALE AJEET B.,KALE AJEET B., ,Kale Ajeet B.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. G.P. FOR R/1, 2 AND 3,KURUNDKAR SUNIL V.,DESHMUKH SHAMBHURAJE V FOR R.NO. 4 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

03-02-2015

URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)

22-12-2016

FOR ORDERS (CIVIL)

05-05-2015

URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)

27-04-2015

URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)

05-01-2015

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Summary of WP/11836/2014 Shaikh Naseer Shaikh Ibrahim v. The State of Maharashtra & Others The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed consolidated writ petitions challenging a 2006 land acquisition award for road widening near Aurangabad under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the petitioners had constructive knowledge of the acquisition since 1991-1992 (draft plan notification) and failed to promptly challenge it, establishing delay and laches. The court found substantial procedural compliance despite alleged defects in newspaper publication and notice, applied the MRTP Act as a self-contained code (not bound by Land Acquisition Act lapsing provisions), and noted compensation was deposited in court. The petitioner's brother had filed an identical petition earlier (dismissed on factual disputes), which was suppressed, warranting dismissal with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/11836/2014 Shaikh Naseer Shaikh Ibrahim v. The State of Maharashtra & Others The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed consolidated writ petitions challenging a 2006 land acquisition award for road widening near Aurangabad under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the petitioners had constructive knowledge of the acquisition since 1991-1992 (draft plan notification) and failed to promptly challenge it, establishing delay and laches. The court found substantial procedural compliance despite alleged defects in newspaper publication and notice, applied the MRTP Act as a self-contained code (not bound by Land Acquisition Act lapsing provisions), and noted compensation was deposited in court. The petitioner's brother had filed an identical petition earlier (dismissed on factual disputes), which was suppressed, warranting dismissal with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case