LAXMAN KISAN KHARADE. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND ANR. — CA/4038/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030118772026

Filing Number

CA/8865/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/4038/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMAN KISAN KHARADE.

    Adv. HUMBE VILAS M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND ANR.

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    Summary of CA/4038/2026 - LAXMAN KISAN KHARADE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Outcome: The application was allowed. Laxman Kisan Kharade and similarly situated claimants are entitled to withdraw deposited land acquisition compensation amounts on parity grounds: 50% upon furnishing undertaking and 25% upon furnishing surety/security to the Registrar (Judicial); balance to be invested in fixed deposit pending appeal resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  5. 08-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  6. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/4038/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA/4038/2026 - LAXMAN KISAN KHARADE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Outcome: The application was allowed. Laxman Kisan Kharade and similarly situated claimants are entitled to withdraw deposited land acquisition compensation amounts on parity grounds: 50% upon furnishing undertaking and 25% upon furnishing surety/security to the Registrar (Judicial); balance to be invested in fixed deposit pending appeal resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case