RUKHMINI @ RUKAHMIN S/O. BAPU MANGLE. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/4041/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030118602026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
CA/8851/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Registration No
CA/4041/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUKHMINI @ RUKAHMIN S/O. BAPU MANGLE.
Adv. HUMBE VILAS M.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 10-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed five consolidated civil applications filed by claimants seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the State of Maharashtra in land acquisition appeals. The court granted partial withdrawal: 50% of the deposited amount on furnishing an undertaking, and an additional 25% upon furnishing surety/security to the Registrar (Judicial), with the remaining balance to be invested in a fixed deposit in a nationalized bank pending further orders. The applications were disposed of accordingly on the ground of parity with similarly placed claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed five consolidated civil applications filed by claimants seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the State of Maharashtra in land acquisition appeals. The court granted partial withdrawal: 50% of the deposited amount on furnishing an undertaking, and an additional 25% upon furnishing surety/security to the Registrar (Judicial), with the remaining balance to be invested in a fixed deposit in a nationalized bank pending further orders. The applications were disposed of accordingly on the ground of parity with similarly placed claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts