BAPU ATMARAM MANGALE. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/4035/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030118542026

Filing Number

CA/8848/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/4035/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAPU ATMARAM MANGALE.

    Adv. HUMBE VILAS M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/4035/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Bapu Atmaram Mangale's application for withdrawal of amounts deposited by the State in land acquisition appeals. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% of the deposited amount upon furnishing an undertaking and 25% upon furnishing surety/security to the Registrar (Judicial), with the remaining 25% to be invested in a fixed deposit. The decision was based on parity with similarly placed claimants in related proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  5. 08-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  6. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/4035/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/4035/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Bapu Atmaram Mangale's application for withdrawal of amounts deposited by the State in land acquisition appeals. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% of the deposited amount upon furnishing an undertaking and 25% upon furnishing surety/security to the Registrar (Judicial), with the remaining 25% to be invested in a fixed deposit. The decision was based on parity with similarly placed claimants in related proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case