KISHOR MOTILAL JAISWAL vs THE COMMISSIONER FOR STATE EXCISE MUMBAI AND ORS — WP/3245/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030118142026

Filing Number

WP/8815/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3245/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHOR MOTILAL JAISWAL

    Adv. GHOLAP AJIT MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER FOR STATE EXCISE MUMBAI AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR, STATE EXCISE

  3. 3.SMT. JIJABAI SONNE (EX. SARPAANCH )

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by bar owner Kishor Motilal Jaiswal challenging cancellation of his FL-III liquor licence by the District Collector. The court granted interim relief, directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner until the State Excise Commissioner decides his stay application and appeal on merits, with a directive to conclude proceedings within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3245/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by bar owner Kishor Motilal Jaiswal challenging cancellation of his FL-III liquor licence by the District Collector. The court granted interim relief, directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner until the State Excise Commissioner decides his stay application and appeal on merits, with a directive to conclude proceedings within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case