BIBHISHAN MAHADEV GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/3960/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2017

CNR: HCBM030116582017

Filing Number

WP/9406/2017

Filing Date

21-Mar-2017

Registration No

WP/3960/2017

Registration Date

22-Mar-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls
Caste Claim - Nt

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIBHISHAN MAHADEV GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SHAIKH MAZHAR A. JAHAGIRDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. G.P.FOR R/1 TO 4 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017 by finding that the petitioners' tenure had already been completed in 2020, rendering the petitions moot. The court held that nothing survived in the petitions and accordingly disposed of all of them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2020

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  4. 23-Mar-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S V GangapurwalaView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3960/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017 by finding that the petitioners' tenure had already been completed in 2020, rendering the petitions moot. The court held that nothing survived in the petitions and accordingly disposed of all of them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case