PUKHRAJ RAJMAL BORA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1101/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030116512026
e-Filing Number
19-03-2026
Filing Number
APPLN/2948/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
APPLN/1101/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUKHRAJ RAJMAL BORA
Adv. Bora Satyajit S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. P.P. FOR R/1 1123
-
2.MADHUKAR MADHAVRAO PATIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) quashed criminal proceedings against Pukhraj Rajmal Bora, a retired judicial officer, for his participation in a 1993 Narmada Bachao Andolan protest. The court found that the 33-year delay in prosecution violated his constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21, especially since no overt acts were attributed to him and he had served the judiciary with distinction. The court held that prosecuting agencies failed to justify the inordinate delay and that the applicant could not be penalized for their negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Due Admission -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APPLN/1101/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) quashed criminal proceedings against Pukhraj Rajmal Bora, a retired judicial officer, for his participation in a 1993 Narmada Bachao Andolan protest. The court found that the 33-year delay in prosecution violated his constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21, especially since no overt acts were attributed to him and he had served the judiciary with distinction. The court held that prosecuting agencies failed to justify the inordinate delay and that the applicant could not be penalized for their negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts