RAM ASHOKRAO CHAUDHARI AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/3075/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030115342026

Filing Number

WP/8613/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3075/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mamlatdar Court Act 1906

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM ASHOKRAO CHAUDHARI AND ORS

    Adv. Khoche Shubham S.

  2. 2.BHAVDU TIRMBAK CHUDHARI

  3. 3.KIRAN FAKIRARAO MORE

  4. 4.SUDHAKAR SIDDHESHWAR NYANE

  5. 5.KRUSHNA BHIKAJI CHAUDHARI

  6. 6.RAJENDRA SAMPAT MORE

  7. 7.PANDURANG YASHWANTA MORE

  8. 8.KALUBA KHANDU MORE

  9. 9.SANTOSH ARUJUN MORE

  10. 10.VIJAY RAJENDRA MORE

  11. 11.HARI ASHOKRAO CHAUDHARI

  12. 12.SHAM BHIKAJI CHAUDHARI

  13. 13.VINAYAK BHIKA CHAUDHARI

  14. 14.SHRIDHAR SIDDHESHWAR NYANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  3. 3.THE TAHSILDAR AND MAMLATDAR TAHSIL KARYALAY

  4. 4.SHRI HAROON AJIJ SHAIKH NAYAB TAHSILDAR MAHSUL-

  5. 5.THE MANDAL ADHKARI GHATNANDRA

  6. 6.THE GRAM MAHSUL ADHIKARI

  7. 7.YUVARAJ KACHRU MORE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) quashed and set aside the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Officer and Mamlatdar, finding that Respondent 7's application was not in conformity with the Mamlatdar's Courts Act and the Mamlatdar failed to comply with statutory requirements. The court granted liberty to Respondent 7 to file a fresh application in accordance with law before the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3075/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) quashed and set aside the orders passed by the Sub Divisional Officer and Mamlatdar, finding that Respondent 7's application was not in conformity with the Mamlatdar's Courts Act and the Mamlatdar failed to comply with statutory requirements. The court granted liberty to Respondent 7 to file a fresh application in accordance with law before the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case