SHRIKANT RAJU MADEWAD THROUGH FATHER R L MADEWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/3060/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM030114422026
Filing Number
WP/8531/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/3060/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIKANT RAJU MADEWAD THROUGH FATHER R L MADEWAD
Adv. SUNIL MAHADEVAPPA VIBHUTE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
-
2.THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE KINWAT -1
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the State's Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending Scheduled Tribe ("Koli Mahadev") claim, preferably by June 30, 2026, to enable him to appear for NEET-UG 2026. The court disposed of the writ petition after noting that a vigilance inquiry report of the petitioner's brother was already available for the Committee's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3060/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the State's Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending Scheduled Tribe ("Koli Mahadev") claim, preferably by June 30, 2026, to enable him to appear for NEET-UG 2026. The court disposed of the writ petition after noting that a vigilance inquiry report of the petitioner's brother was already available for the Committee's consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts