SANTOSHIMATA MAHILA BACHATGAT PONDUL DIST BEED THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERS vs SANJAY KUMAR AND OTEHRS — CP/197/2016
Case under Contempt of Court Act. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030113542016
Next Hearing
28th March 2016
Filing Number
CP/8993/2016
Filing Date
17-03-2016
Registration No
CP/197/2016
Registration Date
22-03-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSHIMATA MAHILA BACHATGAT PONDUL DIST BEED THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERS
Adv. SHINDE BALAJI S.
Respondent(s)
SANJAY KUMAR AND OTEHRS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2016 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 09-06-2016 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 05-05-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 28-03-2016 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 17-06-2016 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the Continuation Petition filed by Santoshimata Mahila Bachatgat (a women's savings group) against Sanjay Kumar and others, finding that the purpose of the petition had been subserved. The court's brief order indicates the matter was resolved, though specific details of the underlying dispute or relief granted are not elaborated in the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the Continuation Petition filed by Santoshimata Mahila Bachatgat (a women's savings group) against Sanjay Kumar and others, finding that the purpose of the petition had been subserved. The court's brief order indicates the matter was resolved, though specific details of the underlying dispute or relief granted are not elaborated in the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts