KAUSHALYA MHATARDEO CHAUDHAR KAUSHALYA PANDHARINATH VANVE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/3939/2017

Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Mar-2017

CNR: HCBM030112252017

Filing Number

WP/9024/2017

Filing Date

18-Mar-2017

Registration No

WP/3939/2017

Registration Date

21-Mar-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAUSHALYA MHATARDEO CHAUDHAR KAUSHALYA PANDHARINATH VANVE

    Adv. WAGH UMAKANT U.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. G.P. FOR R/1 TO 5 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of eleven consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017, finding that the tenure of all petitioners had already been completed in 2020, leaving no live issues to adjudicate. The court held that nothing survives in these petitions and accordingly disposed of them as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Sep-2020

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  4. 22-Mar-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S V GangapurwalaView PDF

  5. 22-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3939/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of eleven consolidated writ petitions filed in 2017, finding that the tenure of all petitioners had already been completed in 2020, leaving no live issues to adjudicate. The court held that nothing survives in these petitions and accordingly disposed of them as moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case