SALMAN JAMIR SHAIKH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/545/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030111402026

Filing Number

BA/2817/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

BA/545/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,189,190,191,115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALMAN JAMIR SHAIKH

    Adv. Syed G R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. P.P. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted bail to both applicants Salman Jamir Shaikh and Abhi Alias Abhishekh Vinod Shejwal in a case involving assault and intimidation. The court found that while the applicants participated in a spontaneous free fight without premeditation, there was insufficient evidence linking them to the grievous injuries inflicted. They were released on Rs. 15,000 personal recognizance bonds each with conditions including weekly reporting to the investigating officer and non-contact with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/545/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted bail to both applicants Salman Jamir Shaikh and Abhi Alias Abhishekh Vinod Shejwal in a case involving assault and intimidation. The court found that while the applicants participated in a spontaneous free fight without premeditation, there was insufficient evidence linking them to the grievous injuries inflicted. They were released on Rs. 15,000 personal recognizance bonds each with conditions including weekly reporting to the investigating officer and non-contact with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case