PUNDLIK VISHWANATH MAMADGE vs BHIMASHANKAR NARAYAN GADEWAR AND ORS — CA/6611/2010
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: --Transfer to other court on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030109102010
Filing Number
CA/9008/2010
Filing Date
30-Mar-2010
Registration No
CA/6611/2010
Registration Date
04-May-2010
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Transfer to other court
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUNDLIK VISHWANATH MAMADGE
Adv. JANAKWADE SHIVSAMB N.
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHIMASHANKAR NARAYAN GADEWAR AND ORS
Adv. COPY SERVED ON S.V. NATU FOR R/5 TO 11 1123
-
2.HEMALATA BHIMASHANKAR GADEWAR
-
3.AVINASH MADHAV PATIL (BOLEGAVE
-
4.DR. BHASKAR MADHAV GADEWAR
-
5.RAMESH SHIRAM CHAUDHARI
-
6.PRABHAKAR VITTHAL KOTGIRE
-
7.RAM VIRANNA WATTAMWAR
-
8.VITTHAL MURLIDHAR KAMTHANE
-
9.SHRIRAM NARAYAN GADEWAR
-
10.GOVIND RAM KOTGIRE
-
11.UTTAM RUKHMAN KOTALWAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) transferred First Appeal No. 715 of 2006 and all related civil applications to the District Court, Latur, finding that the appeal value was less than Rs. one crore, which falls within the District Court's jurisdiction following a 2015 State Government notification enhancing pecuniary limits. The Principal District Judge was directed to assign the matter to the competent court for adjudication, with earlier interim orders to continue until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2020
Due Order
According To Sitting List
-
30-Mar-2010
Case filed
Registration No. CA/6611/2010
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) transferred First Appeal No. 715 of 2006 and all related civil applications to the District Court, Latur, finding that the appeal value was less than Rs. one crore, which falls within the District Court's jurisdiction following a 2015 State Government notification enhancing pecuniary limits. The Principal District Judge was directed to assign the matter to the competent court for adjudication, with earlier interim orders to continue until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts