VIVEK VASANT GHANTE THROUGH VASANT REVANSIDDHA GHANTE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR — WP/3104/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM030108502026
Filing Number
WP/8105/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/3104/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIVEK VASANT GHANTE THROUGH VASANT REVANSIDDHA GHANTE
Adv. JADHAVAR PRATAP V.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR
-
2.THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMITTEE, CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR DIVSIION-2
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's "Koli Mahadev" Scheduled Tribe claim, preferably by end of July 2026, considering the petitioner's need to pursue professional higher studies. The court recognized the urgency of the pending claim and issued a directive to accelerate the decision-making process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3104/2026
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's "Koli Mahadev" Scheduled Tribe claim, preferably by end of July 2026, considering the petitioner's need to pursue professional higher studies. The court recognized the urgency of the pending claim and issued a directive to accelerate the decision-making process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts