SHAMKANT DAULATRAO SURYAWANSH AND OTHERS WANI GIRISH V. vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 1 AND ANOTHER — WP/3917/2021
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030108322020
Next Hearing
02nd March 2021
Filing Number
WP/8601/2020
Filing Date
04-03-2020
Registration No
WP/3917/2021
Registration Date
25-02-2021
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAMKANT DAULATRAO SURYAWANSH AND OTHERS WANI GIRISH V.
LAXMIBAI DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI
HIRALAL DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI
PRAKASH DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI
GOPAL DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI
KAMALBAI RAMSH MANDULE
ALKABAI SHANTARAM CHAVAN
KANCHANBAI RAVINDRA NIKUMB
SAVITABAI DNYANESHWAR SURALKAR
Respondent(s)
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 1 AND ANOTHER
Adv. CHILLARGE SUBHASH S FOR R/2,AGP FOR R.NO. 1 AND 3,R.NO. 3 SERVED. 1123
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION WORKS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
NOTIFICATION
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
| 02-03-2021 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 04-05-2026 | PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 04-05-2026 | PART HEARD - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 27-04-2026 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the writ petition and quashed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's rejection of the petitioners' application under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the officer lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate whether petitioners were estopped from seeking reference due to an undertaking they had given; such issues must be decided by the competent Civil Court. The case was remitted to the Principal Civil Court for determination on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the writ petition and quashed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's rejection of the petitioners' application under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the officer lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate whether petitioners were estopped from seeking reference due to an undertaking they had given; such issues must be decided by the competent Civil Court. The case was remitted to the Principal Civil Court for determination on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts