SHAMKANT DAULATRAO SURYAWANSH AND OTHERS WANI GIRISH V. vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 1 AND ANOTHER — WP/3917/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Mar-2021

CNR: HCBM030108322020

Filing Number

WP/8601/2020

Filing Date

04-Mar-2020

Registration No

WP/3917/2021

Registration Date

25-Feb-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMKANT DAULATRAO SURYAWANSH AND OTHERS WANI GIRISH V.

  2. 2.LAXMIBAI DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI

  3. 3.HIRALAL DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI

  4. 4.PRAKASH DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI

  5. 5.GOPAL DAULATRAO SURYAWANSHI

  6. 6.KAMALBAI RAMSH MANDULE

  7. 7.ALKABAI SHANTARAM CHAVAN

  8. 8.KANCHANBAI RAVINDRA NIKUMB

  9. 9.SAVITABAI DNYANESHWAR SURALKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 1 AND ANOTHER

    Adv. CHILLARGE SUBHASH S FOR R/2,AGP FOR R.NO. 1 AND 3,R.NO. 3 SERVED. 1123

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION WORKS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the writ petition and quashed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's rejection of the petitioners' application under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the officer lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate whether petitioners were estopped from seeking reference due to an undertaking they had given; such issues must be decided by the competent Civil Court. The case was remitted to the Principal Civil Court for determination on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Part Heard - CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 04-May-2026

    Part Heard - CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 20-Apr-2021

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  7. 16-Mar-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  8. 16-Mar-2021

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  9. 02-Mar-2021

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

  10. 11-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 04-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3917/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the writ petition and quashed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's rejection of the petitioners' application under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the officer lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate whether petitioners were estopped from seeking reference due to an undertaking they had given; such issues must be decided by the competent Civil Court. The case was remitted to the Principal Civil Court for determination on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case