ABHIJEET SURESH APASWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — WP/3106/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030108132026

Filing Number

WP/8074/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3106/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHIJEET SURESH APASWAR

    Adv. JADHAVAR PRATAP V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe claim for "Mannervarlu" tribe, preferably by end of July 2026, considering his need to pursue professional higher studies. The petition was disposed with this directive rather than granting substantive relief on the tribe claim itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe claim for "Mannervarlu" tribe, preferably by end of July 2026, considering his need to pursue professional higher studies. The petition was disposed with this directive rather than granting substantive relief on the tribe claim itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case