JAY S/O SURENDRA LODHA THR HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY vs SURESH DEEPCHAND SABHADRA AND ORS — CA/3021/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030107292024
Filing Number
CA/7788/2024
Filing Date
12-Mar-2024
Registration No
CA/3021/2024
Registration Date
15-Mar-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAY S/O SURENDRA LODHA THR HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY
Adv. Bajaj Anil S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH DEEPCHAND SABHADRA AND ORS
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
Case Summary: CA/3021/2024 In Civil Application No. 3021/2024 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), the case was adjourned to 24th June, 2026. The petitioner was absent, while the State's counsel and the intervenor's advocate were present. The court ordered that any interim relief granted previously shall continue till the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
-
15-Oct-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
14-Aug-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
24-Jun-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
24-Jun-2024
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare
-
10-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. MehareView PDF
-
10-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. MehareView PDF
-
12-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CA/3021/2024
Case Summary: CA/3021/2024 In Civil Application No. 3021/2024 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), the case was adjourned to 24th June, 2026. The petitioner was absent, while the State's counsel and the intervenor's advocate were present. The court ordered that any interim relief granted previously shall continue till the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts