Shaikh ahmed shaikh Najeer HAMZAKHAN ISMAILKHAN PATHAN vs Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd — CA/3494/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030106532026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

CA/7955/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/3494/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaikh ahmed shaikh Najeer HAMZAKHAN ISMAILKHAN PATHAN

  2. 2.Rizvanabi shaikh ahmed

    Adv. HAMZAKHAN ISMAILKHAN PATHAN

  3. 3.shaikh saniya shaikh ahmed

    Adv. HAMZAKHAN ISMAILKHAN PATHAN

  4. 4.shaikh hasan shaikh ahmed

    Adv. HAMZAKHAN ISMAILKHAN PATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd

  2. 2.Shaikh Janial s/o Shaikh Shadul,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the insurance company's application for withdrawal of compensation amount, permitting withdrawal of 50% of the awarded amount with proportionate costs and accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking. The court also granted a stay on the tribunal's impugned judgment and award pending final disposal of the first appeal, considering the entire award amount had been deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/3494/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the insurance company's application for withdrawal of compensation amount, permitting withdrawal of 50% of the awarded amount with proportionate costs and accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking. The court also granted a stay on the tribunal's impugned judgment and award pending final disposal of the first appeal, considering the entire award amount had been deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case