SHIVJI LALJI PATIL (DIED) THR. LRS. MANISH SHIVJI PATEL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/10909/2014

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030103712014

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

05th January 2015

Filing Number

WP/7963/2014

Filing Date

24-03-2014

Registration No

WP/10909/2014

Registration Date

29-11-2014

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

SHIVJI LALJI PATIL (DIED) THR. LRS. MANISH SHIVJI PATEL

Adv. Kale Ajeet B.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. NO CAVEAT,G.P. FOR R/1,3 AND 4,PATIL JIWAN J. FOR R.NO. 2,KULKARNI (MAHAJAN) SNEHAL P. FOR R/2,DESHMUKH SHAMBHURAJE V FOR R.NO. 2 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

10-04-2017

FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

22-12-2016

FOR ORDERS (CIVIL)

27-04-2015

URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)

17-04-2020

FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

05-01-2015

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging a 1998 land acquisition by CIDCO for widening the Aurangabad-Waluj road. The court held that the petitioners had actual knowledge of the acquisition proceedings through published notifications and other landowners' objections, and failed to demonstrate prejudice despite substantial compliance with acquisition procedures; the court further ruled that the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (MRTP Act) is a self-contained code where Land Acquisition Act provisions regarding lapsing do not apply, and that possession under an award cannot be invalidated by the petitioners' continued occupation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging a 1998 land acquisition by CIDCO for widening the Aurangabad-Waluj road. The court held that the petitioners had actual knowledge of the acquisition proceedings through published notifications and other landowners' objections, and failed to demonstrate prejudice despite substantial compliance with acquisition procedures; the court further ruled that the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (MRTP Act) is a self-contained code where Land Acquisition Act provisions regarding lapsing do not apply, and that possession under an award cannot be invalidated by the petitioners' continued occupation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case