LADHARAM ARJUN PATEL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/413/2015
Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030103692014
Next Hearing
05th May 2015
Filing Number
WP/7961/2014
Filing Date
24-03-2014
Registration No
WP/413/2015
Registration Date
12-01-2015
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LADHARAM ARJUN PATEL
Adv. Kale Ajeet B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. PATIL JIWAN J. FOR R.NO. 2,DESHMUKH SHAMBHURAJE V FOR R.NO. 2 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
FOR ORDERS (CIVIL)
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)
URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)
FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-12-2016 | FOR ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 16-06-2015 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 05-05-2015 | URGENT CIRCULATION (WP) |
| 22-02-2017 | URGENT CIRCULATION (WP) |
| 17-04-2020 | FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: WP/413/2015 - LADHARAM ARJUN PATEL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA The court dismissed consolidated writ petitions challenging a 2006 land acquisition award by CIDCO for road widening. The petitioners argued procedural defects including inadequate notice and absence of compensation payment. The court held that the MRTP Act acquisition cannot be judged by strict Land Acquisition Act standards, petitioners had constructive knowledge via publication, substantial compliance was shown, and delay/laches bars relief. Compensation was deposited in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: WP/413/2015 - LADHARAM ARJUN PATEL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA The court dismissed consolidated writ petitions challenging a 2006 land acquisition award by CIDCO for road widening. The petitioners argued procedural defects including inadequate notice and absence of compensation payment. The court held that the MRTP Act acquisition cannot be judged by strict Land Acquisition Act standards, petitioners had constructive knowledge via publication, substantial compliance was shown, and delay/laches bars relief. Compensation was deposited in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts