VINOD BHAGWAT BARAVKAR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/3940/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030103582026
Filing Number
CA/7745/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
CA/3940/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD BHAGWAT BARAVKAR.
Adv. MORE ABHIJIT S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Jun-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Vinod Bhagwat Baravkar's application to withdraw the entire compensation amount deposited in court with accrued interest for the Seena Kolegaon Project land acquisition case. The court relied on a consistent precedent from a similar matter arising from the same project and permitted withdrawal upon filing the usual undertaking, rejecting the acquiring body's concerns about recovery difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
07-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/3940/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Vinod Bhagwat Baravkar's application to withdraw the entire compensation amount deposited in court with accrued interest for the Seena Kolegaon Project land acquisition case. The court relied on a consistent precedent from a similar matter arising from the same project and permitted withdrawal upon filing the usual undertaking, rejecting the acquiring body's concerns about recovery difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts