VINOD BHAGWAT BARAVKAR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/3940/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030103582026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CA/7745/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

CA/3940/2026

Registration Date

02-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

VINOD BHAGWAT BARAVKAR.

Adv. MORE ABHIJIT S.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

07-04-2026

URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL

04-05-2026

FOR ORDERS

22-06-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Vinod Bhagwat Baravkar's application to withdraw the entire compensation amount deposited in court with accrued interest for the Seena Kolegaon Project land acquisition case. The court relied on a consistent precedent from a similar matter arising from the same project and permitted withdrawal upon filing the usual undertaking, rejecting the acquiring body's concerns about recovery difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Vinod Bhagwat Baravkar's application to withdraw the entire compensation amount deposited in court with accrued interest for the Seena Kolegaon Project land acquisition case. The court relied on a consistent precedent from a similar matter arising from the same project and permitted withdrawal upon filing the usual undertaking, rejecting the acquiring body's concerns about recovery difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case