RAJENDRA BHANUDAS KSHIRSAGAR. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS. — CA/3937/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030103572026

Filing Number

CA/7744/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CA/3937/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA BHANUDAS KSHIRSAGAR.

    Adv. MORE ABHIJIT S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the civil application of Rajendra Bhanudas Kshirsagar and others, permitting them to withdraw the entire compensation amount (75% of the award plus accrued interest) deposited in court. The court relied on a similar earlier order from the same Seena Kolegaon Project and found no reason to take a different view, despite the acquiring body's concerns about recovery difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/3937/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the civil application of Rajendra Bhanudas Kshirsagar and others, permitting them to withdraw the entire compensation amount (75% of the award plus accrued interest) deposited in court. The court relied on a similar earlier order from the same Seena Kolegaon Project and found no reason to take a different view, despite the acquiring body's concerns about recovery difficulties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case