RAJLAXMI BARSU SAPKALE AND OTHERS vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO LTD THROUGH ITS DIVSIIONAL MANAGER — CA/2962/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030100692025

Filing Number

CA/7679/2025

Filing Date

07-Mar-2025

Registration No

CA/2962/2025

Registration Date

12-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPENSATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJLAXMI BARSU SAPKALE AND OTHERS

    Adv. BHOKARIKAR MADHAV M.

  2. 2.MAYUR BARSU SAPKALE

  3. 3.NIKITA BARSU SAPKALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO LTD THROUGH ITS DIVSIIONAL MANAGER

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/2962/2025 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the applicants' plea to condone 820 days delay in filing a cross appeal, attributing the delay to a software registration issue rather than deliberate neglect. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 29.07.2026, with the insurance company waiving notice requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/2962/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/2962/2025 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the applicants' plea to condone 820 days delay in filing a cross appeal, attributing the delay to a software registration issue rather than deliberate neglect. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 29.07.2026, with the insurance company waiving notice requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case