SHAIKH RIZWAN SHAIKH MUNIR SHAIKH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/3368/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030099912026
Filing Number
WP/7450/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/3368/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIKH RIZWAN SHAIKH MUNIR SHAIKH
Adv. Nirmal Ramchandra J.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY)
-
3.HEADMASTER HEAD ABDUL GAFFAR KHAN URDU HIGH SCHOOL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and directed the Education Officer to correct the petitioner's caste entry in school records from "Muslim Fakir" to "Muslim" within 15 days. The court held that school authorities cannot reject applications for record correction merely because the applicant has left school, and reaffirmed that Rule 26.4 of the Secondary School Code permits such corrections even for former students, warning that future rejections based on this ground would be treated as contempt of court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3368/2026
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition and directed the Education Officer to correct the petitioner's caste entry in school records from "Muslim Fakir" to "Muslim" within 15 days. The court held that school authorities cannot reject applications for record correction merely because the applicant has left school, and reaffirmed that Rule 26.4 of the Secondary School Code permits such corrections even for former students, warning that future rejections based on this ground would be treated as contempt of court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts