Pratiksha W/o Dipak Wavalkar JANRAO ATUL SHIVAJI vs Dipak S/o Dagadu Wavalkar — MCA/75/2026

Case under Transfer Matter Section 24. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030099802026

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

MCA/7444/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCA/75/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer Matter Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pratiksha W/o Dipak Wavalkar JANRAO ATUL SHIVAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipak S/o Dagadu Wavalkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted the wife's application to transfer a matrimonial dispute from the Family Court in Beed to the Family Court in Parbhani, citing her lack of income, financial hardship, and the 150 km distance she would have to travel. The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that matrimonial proceedings should be transferred to where the wife resides to avoid her inconvenience and hardship, and to consolidate related proceedings pending at a single forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) granted the wife's application to transfer a matrimonial dispute from the Family Court in Beed to the Family Court in Parbhani, citing her lack of income, financial hardship, and the 150 km distance she would have to travel. The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that matrimonial proceedings should be transferred to where the wife resides to avoid her inconvenience and hardship, and to consolidate related proceedings pending at a single forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case