MOHAN DAGADU PAWAR AND OTHERS GOVIND KARHALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH IT SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4854/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030099122026

Filing Number

WP/7399/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/4854/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Maharashtra Stamps Act 1958

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAN DAGADU PAWAR AND OTHERS GOVIND KARHALE

  2. 2.PRAVINKUMAR MOHAN PAWAR

  3. 3.NAGNATH MOHAN PAWAR

  4. 4.SAKUBAI MOHAN PAWAR

  5. 5.BABITA MADHUKAR RATHOD

  6. 6.CHBUBAI ASHOK JADHAV

  7. 7.VIJUBAI VIKRAM PAWAR

  8. 8.NIRANJAN VIKRAM PAWAR

  9. 9.SAMKA VIKRAM PAWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH IT SECRETARY AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE JOINT DISTRICT REGISTRAR AND COLLECTOR OF STAMPS

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  4. 4.THE TAHSILDAR AUNDHA NAGNATH

  5. 5.THE TAHSILDAR JINTUR

  6. 6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER TAHSIL OFFICE SAJJA RUPUR

  7. 7.THE CIRCLE OFFICER TAHSIL OFFICE

  8. 8.THE TALATHI SAJJA RUPUR

  9. 9.THE TALATHI SAJJA AADGAON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The Aurangabad High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued regarding stamp duty assessment for property registration following a compromised partition suit. The court held that since the notice was merely a show-cause notice allowing the petitioners to submit written responses, any final order passed would be appealable under Section 32B of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, making immediate writ jurisdiction under Article 226 inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4854/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued regarding stamp duty assessment for property registration following a compromised partition suit. The court held that since the notice was merely a show-cause notice allowing the petitioners to submit written responses, any final order passed would be appealable under Section 32B of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, making immediate writ jurisdiction under Article 226 inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case