PRAVIN VISHWANATH GAWALI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — WP/5063/2026

Case under Caste Claim - St Section 2000. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030098532026

Filing Number

WP/7347/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/5063/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Caste Claim - St Section 2000

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVIN VISHWANATH GAWALI

    Adv. Thorat Chandrakant R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the State's Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Pravin Vishwanath Gawali's pending Scheduled Tribe (Koli Mahdev) status claim within six months, considering that he was appointed to a reserved ST seat and requires a validity certificate. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5063/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the State's Scrutiny Committee to expeditiously decide petitioner Pravin Vishwanath Gawali's pending Scheduled Tribe (Koli Mahdev) status claim within six months, considering that he was appointed to a reserved ST seat and requires a validity certificate. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case