GORAKH TUKARAM DESHMUKH DIED THROUGH LRS VIJAY GORAKH DESHMUKH vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER — CA/3930/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030098012026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
CA/7305/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
CA/3930/2026
Registration Date
02-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GORAKH TUKARAM DESHMUKH DIED THROUGH LRS VIJAY GORAKH DESHMUKH
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
DHANANJAY GORAKH DESHMUKH
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
KAVITA VIKAS CHOUDHARI
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
Respondent(s)
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 09-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad partly allowed the applicant's civil application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount of Rs. 11,04,712/- in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking and an additional 25% upon providing solvent surety/security, with the balance amount to be invested in a nationalized bank, considering the four-fold enhancement claimed warranted a phased release approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad partly allowed the applicant's civil application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount of Rs. 11,04,712/- in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking and an additional 25% upon providing solvent surety/security, with the balance amount to be invested in a nationalized bank, considering the four-fold enhancement claimed warranted a phased release approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts