GORAKH TUKARAM DESHMUKH DIED THROUGH LRS VIJAY GORAKH DESHMUKH vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER — CA/3930/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030098012026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2026
Filing Number
CA/7305/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
CA/3930/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GORAKH TUKARAM DESHMUKH DIED THROUGH LRS VIJAY GORAKH DESHMUKH
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
-
2.DHANANJAY GORAKH DESHMUKH
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
-
3.KAVITA VIKAS CHOUDHARI
Adv. NAIKNAVARE RAMESH VITTHAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
3.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad partly allowed the applicant's civil application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount of Rs. 11,04,712/- in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking and an additional 25% upon providing solvent surety/security, with the balance amount to be invested in a nationalized bank, considering the four-fold enhancement claimed warranted a phased release approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CA/3930/2026
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad partly allowed the applicant's civil application to withdraw the deposited compensation amount of Rs. 11,04,712/- in a land acquisition matter. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking and an additional 25% upon providing solvent surety/security, with the balance amount to be invested in a nationalized bank, considering the four-fold enhancement claimed warranted a phased release approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts