PRAKASH HIRAMAN PAWAR DECASED MEENABAI PRAKASH PAWAR vs THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS — WP/2598/2009

Case under Essential Commodities Act. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Apr-2009

CNR: HCBM030096992009

Filing Number

WP/7837/2009

Filing Date

06-Apr-2009

Registration No

WP/2598/2009

Registration Date

24-Apr-2009

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH HIRAMAN PAWAR DECASED MEENABAI PRAKASH PAWAR

    Adv. AJAY SHANTARAM DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of WP 2598/2009 and 15 related writ petitions after the State's counsel submitted that Maharashtra does not grant kerosene dealership licenses. Finding no surviving cause of action, the court dismissed all petitions accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  4. 16-Mar-2020

    For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )

    According To Sitting List

  5. 11-Feb-2011

    Petitions For Hearing [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari

  6. 13-Jan-2010

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V R Kingaonkar

  7. 27-Apr-2009

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Apr-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2598/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of WP 2598/2009 and 15 related writ petitions after the State's counsel submitted that Maharashtra does not grant kerosene dealership licenses. Finding no surviving cause of action, the court dismissed all petitions accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case