DATTATRAY VISHNU AMRUTKAR vs THE STATE OF MAH THROU SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/2605/2009

Case under Essential Commodities Act. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Apr-2009

CNR: HCBM030096922009

Filing Number

WP/7832/2009

Filing Date

06-Apr-2009

Registration No

WP/2605/2009

Registration Date

24-Apr-2009

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTATRAY VISHNU AMRUTKAR

    Adv. AJAY SHANTARAM DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAH THROU SECRETARY AND ORS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of WP 2605/2009 and 15 consolidated writ petitions challenging the State's refusal to grant kerosene dealership licenses. The court accepted the State's submission that it does not grant kerosene dealership licenses, finding no substantive claim survived. All petitions were accordingly disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  4. 16-Mar-2020

    For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )

    According To Sitting List

  5. 11-Feb-2011

    Petitions For Hearing [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari

  6. 13-Jan-2010

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V R Kingaonkar

  7. 27-Apr-2009

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Apr-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2605/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of WP 2605/2009 and 15 consolidated writ petitions challenging the State's refusal to grant kerosene dealership licenses. The court accepted the State's submission that it does not grant kerosene dealership licenses, finding no substantive claim survived. All petitions were accordingly disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case