RUSTUM CHANDOJI DIPKE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/3748/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030096832026
Filing Number
WP/7220/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/3748/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUSTUM CHANDOJI DIPKE
Adv. DESHMUKH UMAKANT B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD NANDED
-
4.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PANCHAYAT SAMITI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
Summary: The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Rustum Chandoji Dipke's writ petition by directing the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nanded to decide the petitioner's representation for revocation of suspension within four weeks on its own merits, in light of the Government Resolution dated 22.04.2025. The court accepted the respondent's undertaking to decide the matter within this timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3748/2026
Summary: The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Rustum Chandoji Dipke's writ petition by directing the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nanded to decide the petitioner's representation for revocation of suspension within four weeks on its own merits, in light of the Government Resolution dated 22.04.2025. The court accepted the respondent's undertaking to decide the matter within this timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts