RAMESH DASHARATH BHOSLE vs MANISHA BALASAHEB HALNOR — WP/3795/2026

Case under Act Not Known Section 99. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030093662026

Filing Number

WP/6960/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3795/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Act Not Known Section 99

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH DASHARATH BHOSLE

    Adv. Lomte Ashwini Annasaheb

  2. 2.SURESH DASHARATH BHOSLE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHA BALASAHEB HALNOR

  2. 2.SAU. ANJANA AJAY DONGARDIVE BHOSLE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the Writ Petition filed by Ramesh Dasharath Bhosle against Manisha Balasaheb Halnor by allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a Second Appeal. The court granted this permission on the petitioner's advocate's request and ruled that time consumed in prosecuting the writ petition shall be considered while counting the limitation period for the Second Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3795/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the Writ Petition filed by Ramesh Dasharath Bhosle against Manisha Balasaheb Halnor by allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a Second Appeal. The court granted this permission on the petitioner's advocate's request and ruled that time consumed in prosecuting the writ petition shall be considered while counting the limitation period for the Second Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case