CHANDRASHEKHAR DATTATRAYA PAWAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/154/2018

Case under Caste Claim - St. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Mar-2018

CNR: HCBM030091512018

Filing Number

CP/7210/2018

Filing Date

07-Mar-2018

Registration No

CP/154/2018

Registration Date

09-Mar-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRASHEKHAR DATTATRAYA PAWAR

    Adv. Deshmukh Mahesh S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after the respondent's counsel confirmed that the court's contempt order had been complied with. The petition was accordingly closed without further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 22-Jun-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  5. 22-Jun-2018

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal

  6. 12-Mar-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. DhavaleView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/154/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after the respondent's counsel confirmed that the court's contempt order had been complied with. The petition was accordingly closed without further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case