KOMAL DNYANESHWAR NARSUDE PAWAR AMOL AJAY vs DNYANESHWAR KEDARNATH NARSUDE — MCA/64/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24. Disposed: Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED on 28th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030090262026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
MCA/6732/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCA/64/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--APPLICATION ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOMAL DNYANESHWAR NARSUDE PAWAR AMOL AJAY
-
2.TEJAS DNYNAESHAR NARSUDE
Adv. PAWAR AMOL AJAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.DNYANESHWAR KEDARNATH NARSUDE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted the applicant's request to transfer a restitution of conjugal rights petition (HMP No. 37 of 2025) from the court at Barshi to the court at Rahata, citing the applicant's lack of income, the 250 km distance creating hardship, and the existence of a related domestic violence case already pending at Rahata. The court applied Supreme Court precedent that matrimonial proceedings should be transferred to the wife's residence to avoid inconvenience and prevent multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCA/64/2026
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted the applicant's request to transfer a restitution of conjugal rights petition (HMP No. 37 of 2025) from the court at Barshi to the court at Rahata, citing the applicant's lack of income, the 250 km distance creating hardship, and the existence of a related domestic violence case already pending at Rahata. The court applied Supreme Court precedent that matrimonial proceedings should be transferred to the wife's residence to avoid inconvenience and prevent multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts