VIJAYSING KISANSING PARDESHI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/6420/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 226227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030090092018
Filing Number
WP/7105/2018
Filing Date
06-Mar-2018
Registration No
WP/6420/2018
Registration Date
22-Jun-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAYSING KISANSING PARDESHI
Adv. Bachate Pralhad D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. ,HON ASHWIN VINAYAK,IS ATTACHED TO WPST 3276/18,AGP FOR R.NO. 1 TO 5 R.NO. 6 SERVED,D.K.CHITOLKAR FOR R.NO. 7 TO 15,HON ASHWIN VINAYAK,GP FOR R/1 TO 5,R/6 SERVED 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petitions but allowed the petitioner to file a fresh reply with additional documents, finding that the authorities had not considered the Special Auditor's rectification report under Section 82 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before issuing a notice under Section 83. The court directed the enquiry authority to reconsider the petitioner's entire record and pass an appropriate order within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
26-Nov-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
25-Jun-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
16-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
16-Apr-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
03-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
03-Mar-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
20-Jan-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
25-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
25-Nov-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
24-Sep-2024
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
04-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
16-Mar-2020
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
According To Sitting List
-
25-Jun-2019
Urgent Circulation - CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
27-Mar-2019
Due Admission [ After Notice ]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
25-Feb-2019
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
18-Feb-2019
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
16-Jan-2019
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
28-Nov-2018
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
15-Oct-2018
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
19-Sep-2018
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
23-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
23-Aug-2018
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
02-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. DeshmukhView PDF
-
02-Aug-2018
Due Admission (Wp)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh
-
29-Jun-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. DeshmukhView PDF
-
29-Jun-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6420/2018
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petitions but allowed the petitioner to file a fresh reply with additional documents, finding that the authorities had not considered the Special Auditor's rectification report under Section 82 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 before issuing a notice under Section 83. The court directed the enquiry authority to reconsider the petitioner's entire record and pass an appropriate order within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts