SHAKUNTALA SAKHARAM ADMANE M K DESHPANDE vs MOTIRAM RAMCHANDRA ADMANE AND ORS — WP/3007/2008

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030090072008

Filing Number

WP/7106/2008

Filing Date

02-Apr-2008

Registration No

WP/3007/2008

Registration Date

15-Apr-2008

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUNTALA SAKHARAM ADMANE M K DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOTIRAM RAMCHANDRA ADMANE AND ORS

    Adv. R/ 3 TO 12 FORMAL PARTY,BHAVTHANKAR VIVEK VASANTRAO 1123

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF

    The writ petition filed by Shakuntala Sakharam Admane against Motiram Ramchandra Admane and others was disposed of as infructuous by the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench on June 15, 2026. The court's order indicates the petition no longer required adjudication, likely due to changed circumstances or resolution of the underlying dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2019

    For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta

  4. 25-Aug-2008

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  5. 25-Aug-2008

    Urgent Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  6. 14-Aug-2008

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  7. 16-Apr-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Apr-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3007/2008

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition filed by Shakuntala Sakharam Admane against Motiram Ramchandra Admane and others was disposed of as infructuous by the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench on June 15, 2026. The court's order indicates the petition no longer required adjudication, likely due to changed circumstances or resolution of the underlying dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case