SUPRANJANA SANJAY RATHOD ALIAS SUPRANJANA LAXMAN CHAVAN REDDY AVINASH MAHESHKUMAR vs SANJAY SHANKAR RATHOD — CP/104/2026

Case under Contempt of Court Act Section 10 12. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030088462026

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

CP/6580/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

CP/104/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act Section 10 12

Petitioner(s)

SUPRANJANA SANJAY RATHOD ALIAS SUPRANJANA LAXMAN CHAVAN REDDY AVINASH MAHESHKUMAR

Respondent(s)

SANJAY SHANKAR RATHOD

Adv. ,DOIFODE BHARAT SAHEBRAO,NOTICE OF R/1 SERVED,DOIFODE BHARAT SAHEBRAO FOR R.NO. 1 1123

SHANKAR KISHAN RATHOD

KAMAL SHANKAR RATHOD

SANTOSH SHANKAR RATHOD

SUPRIYA SANTOSH RATHOD

SAVITA RAVI PAWAR

SANGEETA ASHOK CHAVAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

10-03-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

11-06-2026
08-05-2026
10-04-2026
17-03-2026

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Case Summary: CP/104/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the petition on June 11, 2026, noting that mediation is ongoing between the parties. While the petitioner alleged the respondent was not participating effectively in mediation, the court refrained from passing any substantive order to avoid impediment to the mediation process. The case was stood over to July 10, 2026, with a warning that if no progress is made in mediation by the next hearing date, an appropriate order would be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/104/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the petition on June 11, 2026, noting that mediation is ongoing between the parties. While the petitioner alleged the respondent was not participating effectively in mediation, the court refrained from passing any substantive order to avoid impediment to the mediation process. The case was stood over to July 10, 2026, with a warning that if no progress is made in mediation by the next hearing date, an appropriate order would be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case