SUPRANJANA SANJAY RATHOD ALIAS SUPRANJANA LAXMAN CHAVAN REDDY AVINASH MAHESHKUMAR vs SANJAY SHANKAR RATHOD — CP/104/2026
Case under Contempt of Court Act Section 10 12. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030088462026
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
CP/6580/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
CP/104/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUPRANJANA SANJAY RATHOD ALIAS SUPRANJANA LAXMAN CHAVAN REDDY AVINASH MAHESHKUMAR
Respondent(s)
SANJAY SHANKAR RATHOD
Adv. ,DOIFODE BHARAT SAHEBRAO,NOTICE OF R/1 SERVED,DOIFODE BHARAT SAHEBRAO FOR R.NO. 1 1123
SHANKAR KISHAN RATHOD
KAMAL SHANKAR RATHOD
SANTOSH SHANKAR RATHOD
SUPRIYA SANTOSH RATHOD
SAVITA RAVI PAWAR
SANGEETA ASHOK CHAVAN
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 11-06-2026 | |
| 08-05-2026 | |
| 10-04-2026 | |
| 17-03-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: CP/104/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the petition on June 11, 2026, noting that mediation is ongoing between the parties. While the petitioner alleged the respondent was not participating effectively in mediation, the court refrained from passing any substantive order to avoid impediment to the mediation process. The case was stood over to July 10, 2026, with a warning that if no progress is made in mediation by the next hearing date, an appropriate order would be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CP/104/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the petition on June 11, 2026, noting that mediation is ongoing between the parties. While the petitioner alleged the respondent was not participating effectively in mediation, the court refrained from passing any substantive order to avoid impediment to the mediation process. The case was stood over to July 10, 2026, with a warning that if no progress is made in mediation by the next hearing date, an appropriate order would be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts