VARSHA BAPU THAKUR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/156/2018

Case under Caste Claim - St. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030088302018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

12th March 2018

Filing Number

CP/6963/2018

Filing Date

05-03-2018

Registration No

CP/156/2018

Registration Date

09-03-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

VARSHA BAPU THAKUR

Adv. Deshmukh Mahesh S.

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. R. No. 3 served. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

08-06-2018

FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

13-04-2018

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

13-07-2018

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

12-03-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

27-04-2020

NOTIFICATION

Orders

12-03-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S V GANGAPURWALA,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN M. DHAVALE
08-06-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. BORDE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN M. DHAVALE
04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Varsha Bapu Thakur's contempt petition by presuming compliance with the earlier order directing the State to decide her tribe claim, given the order's age and the petitioner's counsel providing no contrary information. The court found no basis to pursue the contempt matter further under these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Varsha Bapu Thakur's contempt petition by presuming compliance with the earlier order directing the State to decide her tribe claim, given the order's age and the petitioner's counsel providing no contrary information. The court found no basis to pursue the contempt matter further under these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Caste Claim - St All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case