SHAIKH BASHIR SHAIKH BUDHAN DIED THR LRS SALIMBEE SHAIKH BASHIR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH JOINT SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4944/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030087042026
Filing Number
WP/6474/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/4944/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIKH BASHIR SHAIKH BUDHAN DIED THR LRS SALIMBEE SHAIKH BASHIR
Adv. VAKIL AFZAL HUSAIN M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH JOINT SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER
-
3.THE COLLECTOR
-
4.THE TAHSILDAR
-
5.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
-
6.SUDHAKAR VITHHALRAO WADEKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition by accepting the State's undertaking to decide the petitioners' pending Revision Petition within 12 weeks from May 5, 2026. The court directed respondent No.1 to comply with this stipulated timeline for adjudicating the revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4944/2026
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition by accepting the State's undertaking to decide the petitioners' pending Revision Petition within 12 weeks from May 5, 2026. The court directed respondent No.1 to comply with this stipulated timeline for adjudicating the revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts