BALASAHEB VISHWANATH INZE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — CA/7569/2010
Case under Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030084892010
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
CA/6979/2010
Filing Date
11-03-2010
Registration No
CA/7569/2010
Registration Date
28-05-2010
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALASAHEB VISHWANATH INZE AND ORS
Adv. NANGARE PRASHANT R.
BHAUSAHEB ANANDRAO PATANE
SHANKAR YADAVRAO TWADE
BHASKAR ASHRUBA DANDGE
ANITA UTTAMRAO DESHMUKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
THE COMMISSIONER FOR HANDICAP WELFARE
THE SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER
AZAD EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY PARBHANI THROUGH SECRETARY ALISHAH AZADKHAN
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL
FOR ORDERS
FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL
FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL
FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2020 | URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 09-12-2010 | FOR ORDERS |
| 11-06-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL |
Orders
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition wherein petitioners, former employees of a school closed in 2000 now reopened under new management, sought appointment. A factual dispute exists: respondent No. 5 claims petitioners resigned in 2001, while petitioners deny this and respondent No. 4 denies receiving any resignations. The court directed respondent No. 5 to file an affidavit in reply and stood over the case to 30.09.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition wherein petitioners, former employees of a school closed in 2000 now reopened under new management, sought appointment. A factual dispute exists: respondent No. 5 claims petitioners resigned in 2001, while petitioners deny this and respondent No. 4 denies receiving any resignations. The court directed respondent No. 5 to file an affidavit in reply and stood over the case to 30.09.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts