KISAN CHHAGAN JADHAV DIED THROUGH L RS UMA VAIBHAV BACHUTE AMBADE PRADEEP VILASRAO vs The Executive Engineer Benitura Medium Project Division Irrigation Departmen Omerga Dist Osman — CA/3924/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 466. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030084662026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

CA/6293/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CA/3924/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 466

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISAN CHHAGAN JADHAV DIED THROUGH L RS UMA VAIBHAV BACHUTE AMBADE PRADEEP VILASRAO

  2. 2.DIPALI KISAN JADHAV

    Adv. AMBADE PRADEEP VILASRAO

  3. 3.PRITI KISAN JADHAV

    Adv. AMBADE PRADEEP VILASRAO

  4. 4.PRASAD KISAN JADHAV

    Adv. AMBADE PRADEEP VILASRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Executive Engineer Benitura Medium Project Division Irrigation Departmen Omerga Dist Osman

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLETOR OSMANABAD

  3. 3.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFCER KRIISHNA KHORE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL OSMANABAD

  4. 4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE OMERGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicant's civil application seeking withdrawal of Rs. 12,06,240/- deposited in a land acquisition case. The court found that the property value enhancement from Rs. 3,017 to Rs. 8,000 per unit fell within the permissible four-fold limit and that the acquiring body should not have appealed under State Government policy. The applicant was permitted to withdraw 90% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/3924/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed the applicant's civil application seeking withdrawal of Rs. 12,06,240/- deposited in a land acquisition case. The court found that the property value enhancement from Rs. 3,017 to Rs. 8,000 per unit fell within the permissible four-fold limit and that the acquiring body should not have appealed under State Government policy. The applicant was permitted to withdraw 90% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking to the Registrar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case