THE MAHARASHTRA KRUSHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CO. THR EX. ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT OSMANABAD AND ORS. vs GOKUL VISHWANATH SHINDE AND ANR. — CA/2388/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030083942026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CA/6248/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

CA/2388/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18

Petitioner(s)

THE MAHARASHTRA KRUSHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CO. THR EX. ENGINEER, MEDIUM PROJECT OSMANABAD AND ORS.

Adv. Gaikwad Anil M.

Respondent(s)

GOKUL VISHWANATH SHINDE AND ANR.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

06-05-2026

FOR ORDERS

30-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Case Summary: CA/2388/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Co.'s application to condon a 1215-day delay in filing restoration applications for two First Appeals (Nos. 5258/2022 and 5237/2022), set aside the October 18, 2022 order, and restored both appeals for hearing. The court also permitted withdrawal of 75% of the deposited amount with accrued interest and allowed impleadment of a previously omitted party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/2388/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Co.'s application to condon a 1215-day delay in filing restoration applications for two First Appeals (Nos. 5258/2022 and 5237/2022), set aside the October 18, 2022 order, and restored both appeals for hearing. The court also permitted withdrawal of 75% of the deposited amount with accrued interest and allowed impleadment of a previously omitted party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case