SUMANBAI MADHUKAR DANVE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. — WP/3792/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030083752026
Filing Number
WP/6238/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
WP/3792/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMANBAI MADHUKAR DANVE
Adv. HON ASHWIN VINAYAK
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
THE TAHSILDAR
ANIL TRIMBAK DETHE
TRIMBAK PUNDLIK DETHE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 22-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition filed by Sumanbai Madhukar Danve, upholding the trial court's rejection of her request to frame an additional issue regarding civil court jurisdiction over an agricultural land sale deed. The court held that since the land was lawfully allotted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act and sale permission was granted, no jurisdictional dispute requiring decision by the competent authority under the Act arose, and the suit's fraud-based challenge to the sale deed could proceed in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition filed by Sumanbai Madhukar Danve, upholding the trial court's rejection of her request to frame an additional issue regarding civil court jurisdiction over an agricultural land sale deed. The court held that since the land was lawfully allotted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act and sale permission was granted, no jurisdictional dispute requiring decision by the competent authority under the Act arose, and the suit's fraud-based challenge to the sale deed could proceed in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts