SUMANBAI MADHUKAR DANVE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. — WP/3792/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030083752026
Filing Number
WP/6238/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/3792/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMANBAI MADHUKAR DANVE
Adv. HON ASHWIN VINAYAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
-
2.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT
-
3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER
-
4.THE TAHSILDAR
-
5.ANIL TRIMBAK DETHE
-
6.TRIMBAK PUNDLIK DETHE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition filed by Sumanbai Madhukar Danve, upholding the trial court's rejection of her request to frame an additional issue regarding civil court jurisdiction over an agricultural land sale deed. The court held that since the land was lawfully allotted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act and sale permission was granted, no jurisdictional dispute requiring decision by the competent authority under the Act arose, and the suit's fraud-based challenge to the sale deed could proceed in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3792/2026
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition filed by Sumanbai Madhukar Danve, upholding the trial court's rejection of her request to frame an additional issue regarding civil court jurisdiction over an agricultural land sale deed. The court held that since the land was lawfully allotted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act and sale permission was granted, no jurisdictional dispute requiring decision by the competent authority under the Act arose, and the suit's fraud-based challenge to the sale deed could proceed in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts